Exploring the links between gut microbiota and excitatory and inhibitory brain processes in alcohol use disorder: A TMS study

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

While the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behavior is increasingly recognized, human studies examining this question are still scarce. The primary objective of the current study was to explore the potential relationships between the gut microbiota composition, motor cortical excitability at rest and during inhibitory control, as well as behavioral inhibition, in healthy volunteers and in patients suffering from alcohol use disorder. Motor cortical excitability was examined using a range of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures probed at rest, including the recruitment curve, short and long intracortical inhibition, and intracortical facilitation within the primary motor cortex.

Background

Moreover, TMS was applied during a choice reaction time task to assess changes in motor excitability associated with inhibitory control. Finally, behavioral inhibition was investigated using a neuropsychological task (anti-saccade). Overall, our results highlight several interesting correlations between microbial composition and brain measures. Hence, higher bacterial diversity, as well as higher relative abundances of UGC-002 and Christensenellaceae R-7 group were correlated with stronger changes in motor excitability associated with inhibitory control. Also, higher abundance of Anaerostipes was associated with higher level of corticospinal excitability. Finally, relative abundances of Bifidobacterium and Faecalibacterium were positively related to performance in the neuropsychological task, suggesting that they might have a positive impact on behavioral inhibition. Although correlation is not causation, the present study suggests that excitatory and inhibitory brain processes might be related to gut microbiota composition. This article is part of the Special Issue on 'Microbiome & the Brain: Mechanisms & Maladies'

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 1 study investigating the researchable question:

Exploring the links between gut microbiota and excitatory and inhibitory brain processes in alcohol use disorder: A TMS study

Level of evidence

C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  Read more→


Please see Table 1 for your response.

 

Enter title in bold, with all first words capitalized, and without a reference number

Design

Objective terms describing the type of study (randomized, uncontrolled, retrospective, placebo-controlled, cross-over, etc.); N= (total subjects)

Objective

State the objective (purpose) of the study using the author’s language(usually beginning with “To” and without a period, assuming a non-complete sentence)

Study Groups

Only the separate groups and their cohort number (n) should be listed. You can describe more details of the cohorts in the methods section so this section can stay very succinct.

Inclusion Criteria

Include relevant inclusion criteria (not a comprehensive list).

Exclusion Criteria

Include relevant exclusion criteria (not a comprehensive list).

Methods

This is our most important section. Data collection and any other information needed to understand the results is presented. Any loose ends from all other sections are tied up here, as concisely as possible.

Duration

Include the duration of the trial as a whole, as well as the duration of the interventions.

Outcome Measures

If the primary outcome measure isn’t explicit from the study, all outcome measures applicable to the inquiry can be listed in this section. If the primary outcome measure is explicit, then make separate sections for ‘Primary’ and ‘Secondary’ Outcome Measures.  


All outcome measures listed should correlate directly/exactly with the results presented later.

Baseline Characteristics

  

A

B

  

Age, years

      

Female

     

White

      

---

     

Include relevant baseline characteristics that will provide a general (big picture) view of the patients in the study.

Results

Endpoint

A

B

p-Value

----

      

----

      

All results listed should correlate directly/exactly with the outcome measures presented previously.Results that do not have to do with the inquiry should not be included; just the stated outcomes need corresponding results.


Tables are encouraged to display the most info using the least space/words.

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: (or those deemed frequent; if not listed in study, use N/A or “Not disclosed”)

Serious Adverse Events: (or those deemed high risk; if not listed in study, use N/A or “Not disclosed”)

Percentage that Discontinued due to Adverse Events: (if not listed in study, use N/A or “Not disclosed”)

Study Author Conclusions

Copy and paste the author’s conclusions on the question at hand, using full sentences. Don’t include any conclusions that don’t correspond to results we list.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

As the expert, add 1-2 sentences on strengths, weaknesses, and takeaways from this study. Focus on insight as “more research is needed” is obvious.